Cccccccccccccc

ideas thinkers beat on david a. kolb on existential teaching David A. Kolbs representative of existential in signifieration dejection be found in many discussions of the hypothesis and practice of heavy(a) education, cozy education and lifelong study. We set out the manakin, and examine its possibilities and chores. circumscribe introduction david a. olb david kolb on existential attainment david kolb on accomplishment styles issues tuitions jarvis on skill a guide to reading links how to cite this order As Stephen Brookfield (1983 16) has commented, writers in the field of experiential cultivation watch tended to theatrical role the term in two contrasting hotshots. On the whizz communicate the term is character to describe the sort of training under covern by students who argon given a chance to acquire and apply knowledge, skills and feelings in an fast and relevant setting.existential information thus involves a, occupy encounter with the phenomena being analyze alternatively than merely thinking nearly the encounter, or scarcely considering the incident of doing nearthing almost it. (Borzak 1981 9 quoted in Brookfield 1983). This sort of encyclopaedism is sponsored by an administration and might be utilise on training programmes for professions much(prenominal) as friendly work and teaching or in field cultivation programmes such as those for cordial administration or geography courses.The s type of experiential schooling is education that occurs as a direct participation in the events of life (Houle 1980 221). Here meeting is not sponsored by some formal educational institution scarcely by people themselves. It is skill that is achieved through reflection upon e rattlingday bed and is the vogue that most of us do our learning. Much of the literature on experiential learning, as beam of light Jarvis comments (1995 75), is actually about learning from primary last, that is learning through sen se sleep togethers.He continues, unfortunately it has tended to exclude the idea of secondary experience entirely. Jarvis overly draws upkeep to the dissimilar uses of the term, citing Weil and McGills (1989 3) categorization of experiential learning into four villages village unity is concerned evently with assessing and accrediting learning from life and work experience. Village ii centralizees on experiential learning as a prat for bringing change in the structures of post-school education. Village Three emphasizes experiential learning as a basis for group consciousness pinnacle.Village Four is concerned about personal growth and self-aw beness. These villages of approaches retain a focus on primary experience (and do not very problematize the notion of experience itself). Jarvis (1995 77-80) makes the case for a concern for secondary or indirect experience (occurring through linguistic communication). While on that point lead been several(a) additions to the lite rature, such as the above, it is the work of David A. Kolb (1976 1981 1984) and his associate Roger claw (Kolb and tyke 1975) that still provides the central impactence point for discussion. next on from Kolbs work on that point has been a growing literature around experiential learning and this is declarative mood of greater attention to this domain of a function by practitioners limitedly in the area of higher education. David Kolbs interest lay in exploring the handlees associated with making sense of concrete experiences and the diametric styles of learning that may be involved. In this he makes unmistakable use of the work of Piaget, Dewey and Lewin. David A. Kolb David A. Kolb is Professor of organizational Behavior in the Weatheread coach of Management.He joined the School in 1976. Born in 1939, Kolb received his Batchelor of humanistic discipline from Knox College in 1961, his MA from Harvard in 1964 and his PhD from Harvard in 1967. Besides his work on expe riential learning, David A. Kolb is also known for his contribution to thinking around organizational behaviour (1995a 1995b). He has an interest in the nature of individual and social change, experiential learning, career development and executive and professional education. David Kolb on experiential learning David A.Kolb (with Roger Fry) prepared his famous model out of four elements concrete experience, contemplation and reflection, the formation of abstract inventions and interrogatory in new situations. He stand for these in the famous experiential learning circle that involves (1) concrete experience followed by (2) observation and experience followed by (3) forming abstract concepts followed by (4) assaying in new situations (after Kurt Lewin). It is a model that appears time and again. Kolb and Fry (1975) indicate that the learning cycle can begin at any one of the four points and that it should really be approached as a continuous spiral.However, it is suggested t hat the learning process often begins with a person carrying out a particular feat and then seeing the effect of the action in this situation. Following this, the second step is to understand these effects in the particular precedent so that if the same action was taken in the same component it would be possible to anticipate what would follow from the action. In this pattern the trio step would be understanding the widely distributed principle under which the particular instance falls.Generalizing may involve actions all over a range of sight to gain experience beyond the particular instance and suggest the general principle. Understanding the general principle does not imply, in this chronological sequence, an ability to discourse the principle in a symbolic medium, that is, the ability to put it into words. It implies only the ability to see a connection amongst the actions and effects over a range of backgrounds. (Coleman 1976 52). An educator who has learnt in this way may tumesce fork over various rules of thumb or generalizations about what to do in different situations.They will be able to say what action to take when say, there is tension between two people in a group but they will not be able to lecture their actions in psychodynamic or sociological terms. There may thus be difficulties about the transferability of their learning to other settings and situations. When the general principle is understood, the last step, harmonise to David Kolb is its application through action in a new circumstance within the range of generalization. In some representations of experiential learning these steps, (or ones equivalent them), are sometimes represented as a circular movement.In reality, if learning has taken place the process could be seen as a spiral. The action is taking place in a different set of helping and the learner is now able to anticipate the possible effects of the action. Two aspects can be seen as especially noteworthy the us e of concrete, here-and-now experience to test ideas and use of feedback to change practices and theories (Kolb 1984 21-22). Kolb joins these with Dewey to emphasize the developmental nature of the exercise, and with Piaget for an detainment of cognitive development.He named his model so as to emphasize the link with Dewey, Lewin and Piaget, and to nervous strain the role experience plays in learning. He wished to distinguish it from cognitive theories of the learning process (see Coleman 1976). David Kolb on learning styles David Kolb and Roger Fry (1975 35-6) argue that effective learning entails the possession of four different abilities (as indicated on each pole of their model) concrete experience abilities, brooding observation abilities, abstract conceptualization abilities and officious experimentation abilities.Few us can approach the ideal in this respect and tend, they suggest, to develop a strength in, or orientation to, in one of the poles of each attribute. As a r esult they developed a learning style strain (Kolb 1976) which was designed to place people on a line between concrete experience and abstract conceptualization and active experimentation and pondering observation. Using this Kolb and Fry proceeded to identify four basic learning styles. Kolb and Fry on learning styles (Tennant 1996) encyclopedism style teaching characteristicDescriptionConvergerAbstract conceptualization + active experimentation strong in practical application of ideas can focus on hypo-deductive reasoning on specific problems unemotional has narrow interests DivergerConcrete experience + reflective observation strong in imaginative ability healthy at generating ideas and seeing things from different perspectives interested in people wide-eyed cultural interests AssimilatorAbstract conceptualization + reflective observation strong ability to create theoretical models excels in inductive reasoning concerned with abstract concepts rather than peopleAccom modatorConcrete experience + active experimentation greatest strength is doing things more of a risk taker performs well when required to react to immediate circumstances solves problems intuitively In developing this model Kolb and Fry have helped, along with Witkin (1950), have helped to challenge those models of learning that seek to reduce emf to one dimension such as intelligence (Tennant 1997 91). They also recognize that there are strengths and weaknesses associated with each style (and that being locked into one style can put a learner at a serious disadvantage).However, there are a number of problems with the model. Issues Here I want to note sise key issues that arise out the Kolb model It pays insufficient attention to the process of reflection (see Boud et al 1983). While David A. Kolbs scheme has been useful in assisting us in formulation learning activities and in helping us to feel out simply that learners can be effectively engaged, they comment, it does not h elp to debunk the elements of reflection itself (ibid. 13), see reflection. The claims made for the four different learning styles are extravagant (Jarvis 1987 Tennant 1997).As Tennant (1997 91) comments, even though the four learning styles neatly dovetail joint with the different dimensions of the experiential learning model, this doesnt necessarily validate them. David Kolb is putting antecedent a particular learning style. The problem here is that the experiential learning model does not apply to all situations. There are alternatives such as information assimilation. There are also others such as memorization. Each of these may be appropriate to different situations (see Jarvis below). The model takes very little account of different cultural experiences/conditions (Anderson 1988).The Inventory has also been used within a fairly limited range of cultures (an important regard if we approach learning as situated i. e. affected by environments). As Anderson (1988, cited in Te nnant 1996) highlights, there is a need to take account of differences in cognitive and communication styles that are culturally- base. Here we need to attend to different models of selfhood and the extent to which these may differ from the western assumptions that underpin the Kolb and Fry model. The idea of stages or steps does not sit well with the reality of thinking.There is a problem here that of sequence. As Dewey (1933) has said in relation to reflection a number of processes can occur at once, stages can be jumped. This way of presenting things is rather too neat and is simplistic see reflection. Empirical gage for the model is weak (Jarvis 1987 Tennant 1997). The initial research base was small, and there have only been a limited number of studies that have sought to test or explore the model (such as Jarvis 1987). advancemore, the learning style schedule has no capacity to measure the degree of integration of learning styles (Tennant 1997 92).The human relationshi p of learning processes to knowledge is problematic. As Jarvis (1987) again points out, David Kolb is able to show that learning and knowledge are intimately related. However, two problems arise here. David Kolb doesnt really explore the nature of knowledge in any depth. In chapter five of existential Learning he discusses the structure of knowledge from what is basically a social psychology perspective. He doesnt really connect with the rich and varied debates about the nature of knowledge that raged over the centuries within philosophy and social theory.This factor that I do not think he really grasps different ways of knowing. For example, Kolb focuses on processes in the individual mind, rather than seeing learning as situated. Second, for David Kolb, learning is concerned with the production of knowledge. Knowledge results from the combination of avaricious experience and transforming it (Kolb 1984 41). Here we might contrast this position with Paulo Freire. His focus is upon informed, move action (praxis). Given these problems we have to take some care glide path David Kolbs vision of experiential learning.However, as Tennant (1997 92) points out, the model provides an excellent framework for planning teaching and learning activities and it can be usefully employed as a guide for understanding learning difficulties, vocational counselling, academic advising and so on. Developments Peter Jarvis on (experiential) learning Jarvis (1987, 1995) set out to show that there are a number of responses to the potential learning situation. He used Kolbs model with a number of different adult groups and occupyed them to explore it based on their own experience of learning.He was then able to develop a model of which allowed different routes. Some of these are non-learning, some non-reflective learning, and some reflective learning. To see these we need to trace out the trajectories on the diagram he produces. reproduced from Jarvis 1994 Non-learning Presumption (boxes 1-4). This is where people interact through patterned behaviour. Saying howdy etc. Non-consideration (1-4). Here the person does not respond to a potential learning situation. Rejection (boxes 1-3 to 7 to 9). Non-reflective Pre-conscious (boxes 1-3 to 6 to either 4 or 9).This form occurs to every person as a result of having experiences in fooling living that are not really thought about. Skimming crosswise the surface. Practice (boxes 1-3 to 5 to 8 to 6 to either 4 or 9). Traditionally this has been restricted to things like training for a manual business or acquiring particular physical skills. It may also refer to the acquisition of language itself. Memorization (boxes 1-3 to 6 and possibly 8 to 6 and then either to 4 or 9) thoughtful learning contemplation (boxes 1-3 to 7 to 8 to 6 to 9). Here the person considers it and makes an intellectual ratiocination about it.Reflective practice (boxes 1-3 (to 5) to 7 to 5 to 6 to 9). This is close to what Schon describes as relfection on and in action. Experiential learning (boxes 1-3 to 7 to 5 to 7 to 8 to 6 to 9). The way in which pragmatic knowledge may be learned. While this represents a useful addition to our thinking about learning, a number of problems remain. There is still an issue around sequence many things may be happening at once, but Jarvis model falls into trap of stage thinking. As with Kolbs work there is a limited experimental base to support it.We can also ask questions as to whether these are different forms or routes or can they sort out together in a different and more compact way. Further reading and references The literature around this area can be attractive dire. We have picked one or two of the meliorate collections/explorations accession a couple standards. Boud, D. et al (eds. ) (1985) Reflection. Turning experience into learning, capital of the United Kingdom Kogan Page. 170 pages. full(a) collection of readings which examine the nature of reflection. The early chap ters make particular use of Dewey and Kolb. Boud. D. and Miller, N. eds. ) (1997) Working with Experience animating learning, London Routledge. Useful collection of pieces exploring experiential learning. The editors focus on animation (not so much in the french and Italian senses as breathing life into to activate, enliven, vivify. Includes introductory and closing pieces by the editors Brookfield on breaking dependence on experts Smyth on socially full of life educators Heron on helping whole people learn Tisdell on life experience and feminist theory Harris on animating learning in teams and Mace on writing and power.Fraser, W. (1995) Learning From Experience. Empowerment or incorporation, Leicester National Institute of Adult proceed Education. Examines APL / APEL and asks what is lost and gained in the interpreting of private experience into the public sphere. Based on the experience of various courses. Jarvis, P. (1987) Adult Learning in the Social Con textual matter, Lon don Croom Helm. 220 pages. Peter Jarvis uses Kolbs model to explore the process of learning in context. The result is a better appreciation of context and the ability to approach memorization, contemplation, practice etc.However, he also inherits a number of problems e. g. around stages. The model is revisited and summarized in P. Jarvis (1995) Adult and Continuing Education. Theory and practice 2e, London Routledge. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, F. P. (1996) Joining Together Group theory and group skills, 6e. , Boston, Mass. Allyn and Bacon. 612 pages. Rightly popular practical groupwork guide with plenty of examples and exercises, plus some good foundational chapters. It was one of the first texts to pick up on Kolb and to link experiential learning with the work around groups by Lewin and others.Chapters on group dynamics experiential learning group goals and social independency communications within groups leadership decision making controversy and creativity conflicts of intere st, the uses of power dealing with diversity conduct learning and discussion groups leading growth and counselling groups and team development, team training. Keeton, M. T. (ed. ) (1976) Experiential Learning, San Francisco Jossey-Bass. Ageing but still useful collection. See, in particular, Colemans contrasting of information assimilation with experiential learning. Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall. 256 pages. Full statement and discussion of Kolbs ideas concerning experiential learning. Chapters deal with the foundation of contemporary approaches to experiential learning the process of experiential learning structural foundations of the learning process individuality in learning and the concept of learning styles the structure of knowledge the experiential learning theory of development learning and development in higher education lifelong learning and integrative development. Mezirow, J. 1991) Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learni ng, San Francisco Jossey-Bass. 247 + xix pages. Develops a comprehensive theory of how adults learn by making meanings of their experiences. Particular focus on perspective transformation. Weil, S. Warner & McGill, I. (eds. ) (1989) making Sense of Experiential Learning. Diversity in theory and practice, Milton Keynes Open University Pres s. The texts on experiential learning tend to be rather atheoretical (and often precious). This text doesnt totally escape this but has a number of useful contributions. ReferencesAnderson, J. A. (1988) cognitive styles and multicultural populations, Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1) 2-9. Brookfield, S. D. (1983) Adult Learning, Adult Education and the union Milton Keynes Open University Press. Borzak, L. (ed. ) (1981) Field Study. A source book for experiential learning, Beverley Hills perspicacious Publications. Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think, New York Heath. Houle, C. (1980) Continuing Learning in the Professions, San Francisco Jossey-Bass. Jarvis, P. (1994) Learning, ICE301 Lifelong Learning, Unit 1(1), London YMCA George Williams College.Jarvis, P. (1995) Adult and Continuing Education. Theory and practice 2e, London Routledge. Kolb, A. and Kolb D. A. (2001) Experiential Learning Theory Bibliography 1971-2001, Boston, Ma. McBer and Co, http//trgmcber. haygroup. com/Products/learning/bibliography. htm Kolb, D. A. (1976) The Learning Style Inventory Technical Manual, Boston, Ma. McBer. Kolb, D. A. (1981) Learning styles and disciplinary differences. in A. W. Chickering (ed. ) The Modern American College, San Francisco Jossey-Bass. Kolb, D. A. (with J. Osland and I.Rubin) (1995a) Organizational Behavior An Experiential Approach to Human Behavior in Organizations 6e, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall. Kolb, D. A. (with J. Osland and I. Rubin) (1995b) The Organizational Behavior Reader 6e, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall. Kolb. D. A. and Fry, R. (1975) Toward an applied theory of experiential learning, in C. Cooper (ed. ) Theories of Group Process, London John Wiley. Schon, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, New York Basic Books Tennant, M. (1997) Psychology and Adult Learning 2e, London Routledge. Witkin, H. and Goodenough, D. 1981) cognitive Styles, Essences and Origins Field dependence and field independence, New York Links Experiential learning helpful review of sites by Tim Pickles. Experiential Learning Theory Bibliography ready by Alice Kolb and David Kolb, this is an extensive bibliography of on experiential learning theory from 1971-2001. recognition The workshop picture representing experiential learning is from the EFEO Action Workshops in 2008. It was taken by devilarts and is copyrighted. It is reproduced here under a Creative Commons permission (Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2. Generic) flickr http//www. flickr. com/photos/devilarts/2458317215/. How to cite this article Smith, M. K. (2001). David A. Kolb on experiential learning, the encyclopedia of informal educa tion. Retrieved enter date from http//www. infed. org/b-explrn. htm. Mark K. Smith 1996, 2001. infed is a not-for-profit site about us disclaimer provided by the YMCA George Williams College. Give us feedback write for us. Check our privacy policy and, when copying, our copyright notice. Join us on Facebook and Twitter. Hosting by Memset Dedicated Servers CarbonNeutral.