To Convince Patients to Share Data, Engage them in the Process - 1100 Words

To Convince Patients to Share Data, Engage them in the Process (Essay Sample) Content: To Convince Patients to Share Data, Engage them in the Process Name Institutional Affiliation To Convince Patients to Share Data, Engage them in the Process The process of transforming care and service delivery in health care is a significant approach and is achievable through engaging patients. It is imperative to note that patient engagement entails tools, activities, and relationships by both patients and clinicians towards promoting the aspect ofÂÂ  decision-making. Patients feel empowered when theyÂÂ  are engagedÂÂ  in the process of clinicalÂÂ  proceduresÂÂ  and will be willing to share data that is essential in decision-making. As a result, this will enhanceÂÂ  the quality ofÂÂ  care, promote patient empowerment, andÂÂ  easeÂÂ  improved health care outcomes for patients since theyÂÂ  are empowered. In addition, empowering patients is a valuable tool for providers to improve health careÂÂ  qualityÂÂ  because patients readily share data and informationÂÂ  aboutÂÂ  various aspects that is important to the entire process. Moreover, researchers should approach establishing patient engagement strategy in order toÂÂ  getÂÂ  data that isÂÂ  considerableÂÂ  to initiatives such as Cancer Moonshot. The patient engagement process entailsÂÂ  the application ofpatient surveys to benchmark provider and patient readiness. Survey results are significant because they enhance the patient`s readiness toÂÂ  provideÂÂ  data that is critical in addressing various health conditions across the globe. Researchers play a critical role in promoting health care through analysis of data collected in relation to various issues within the health care system. Involving themÂÂ  on aspects such asÂÂ  previousÂÂ  researchesÂÂ  andÂÂ  the significance ofÂÂ  the researchÂÂ  to beÂÂ  conducted is essential. Majority of researchers fail to collect adequate data from patientsregardingÂÂ  various healthÂÂ  conditionsÂÂ  because they do not involve pa tients in the research process.ÂÂ   Releasing control of theÂÂ  individualsÂÂ  who will get access to study information is another essential aspect. This is because research is a process that requires participation from all participants, and moderationÂÂ  at all times. For instance,ÂÂ  M-CEITAÂÂ  has played a big role in helping providers andÂÂ  researchersÂÂ  get the most out of patient engagement. This implies that once patientsÂÂ  are engagedÂÂ  in the activities of the providers or researchers, they develop the sense ofÂÂ  readinessÂÂ  and value of the process. For instance, cancer research is essential towards creating awareness and medical innovations. However, this faces obstacles because patients are not involved in the process of research. Releasing control to get access of information from patientsÂÂ  may not beÂÂ  followed by the expectations of a researcher if there is little engagement with the patient. Currently, there are little incentives for cancer patients to share their data because they are less engaged in the processes of research. It is imperative to note that incentives that promote patient participation will convince them to share information and dataÂÂ  regardingÂÂ  various health conditions. These incentives include participating in health-related online social networks that offers a platform for patients to feel free and share dataregardingÂÂ  health conditions. Online social networksÂÂ  provideÂÂ  a conducive space that allows patients from various regions to adequately collect data from patients suffering from various health conditions. It is imperative to note that patientsÂÂ  should beÂÂ  given the greenlight by researchers to approach aspects such as their experiences with the health conditions and how they are coping with medical interventions. In most cases, patients do not share dataregardingÂÂ  these conditions because t hey are limited to the findings of a researcher and their confidentiality. Markman stipulates that "patients should have the rightÂÂ  to accessÂÂ  andÂÂ  evaluateÂÂ  the resultsÂÂ  whether or nottheyÂÂ  contributeÂÂ  their health information to a repository" (Dvorak 2016). Patient should have the right or opportunityÂÂ  to accessÂÂ  andÂÂ  evaluateÂÂ  the results as it is a key aspect in their engagement and ensures they are fully engaged not only in the process of data sharing, but also the outcomes of the data collected. This is a critical aspect becauseÂÂ  mostÂÂ  the patients will not share information, unless assured that the end resultsÂÂ  will be sharedwith them.ÂÂ  The notion ofÂÂ  patient engagement with the researcher is toÂÂ  make sureÂÂ  that theÂÂ  empowermentÂÂ  process is adequately implemented on the patients. WhenÂÂ  empowermentÂÂ  is highly approached, the end results will be high response and sharing information about health condi tions such as cancer by patients.ÂÂ   Convincing patients about the benefits of data sharing is another important aspect. For instance, patientscan beÂÂ  informed on the benefits they are likely toÂÂ  makeÂÂ  as a result of sharing dataÂÂ  aboutÂÂ  various health conditions they are suffering from. Informing patients about the benefits of sharing data may include the value of developing more superiorÂÂ  antibioticsÂÂ  and other medications. Through this, patients find the value of sharing information because it will benefit them. In addition, the researcher has to outline other benefits such as creating awareness in the society through various initiatives that willÂÂ  make sureÂÂ  cancer patients receive desirable care. This will help others in the community understand theÂÂ  significanceÂÂ  of undertaking screening for cancer before the condition developes into fatal stages. Receiving decision support for healthcare and health management decisions is another aspect that researchers in the health care sector can u...